T.C. SUPREME22.Legal Department Mainly: 2014/19136Decision: 2014/23067Decision Date: 08.09.2014 EMPLOYEE RECEIVABLES CASE – IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFF DEFAULTS TO THE EMPLOYER IN TERMS OF THE AFOREMENTIONED RECEIVABLES – OPERATION OF THE HIGHEST INTEREST APPLIED TO DEPOSITS BY BANKS FROM THE DATE OF DEFAULT ON OVERWORK AND GENERAL HOLIDAY Abstract: in a concrete case, the plaintiff requested […]
T.C. SUPREME9. Legal Department Principal No: 2007/14430Decision No: 2008/8214Date Of Decision: 11.04.2008 LABOR CLAIMS CASE – THE WORK OF THE CLAIMANT’S MARRIED WIFETO THIS CITY BY MARRIAGE BECAUSE IT IS IN ANOTHER PROVINCETHE REASON FOR THE CHANGE IN THE PROVINCE – WHICH HE STATED WAS SETTLED-IS FROM MARRIAGESOURCE-ACCEPTANCE OF PLAINTIFF’S SEVERANCE REQUESTRequirement Summary: The plaintiff […]
T.OSUPREME LEGAL DEPARTMENTPRINCIPAL NO: 2014/811DECISION NO: 2015/14090DECISION DATE: 14.04.2015 IF WORK IS DONE OUTSIDE THE WORK OF THE WORKER, HE / SHE WILL KNOW THE WAGE FROM THE EMPLOYER. The plaintiff requested that the payment of unpaid wages and balance period wage receivables be decided. The Local Court has decided to partially accept the case. […]
T.C.SUPREMEGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF LAWPRINCIPAL NO: 2018/7-179DECISION NO: 2018/683DECISION DATE: 4.4.2018 > > THERE IS NO LEGAL BASIS FOR CREATING A QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WORK BEFORE EMPLOYMENT AND THE WORK AFTER EMPLOYMENT, OR FOR TAKING ACTION AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF BY IGNORING THE WORK BEFORE EMPLOYMENT– THE FACT THAT THE WORKER, WHO IS ECONOMICALLY DEPENDENT ON […]
T.C. SUPREME 9.Legal Department Basis: 2016/36192 Verdict: 2018/998 Decision Date: 23.01.2018 Summary: since the plaintiff worked for more than 5 years, the employment contract was terminated due to lack of performance, the termination performed by the employer was not based on valid reasons, it is appropriate to decide the invalidity of the termination and the […]
