Twitter social networking site @ertemsener username created in the twitter account with the user name and profile picture in this account to remove the imitation tweet A. A .. Ş .. attorney’s request on the rejection of Büyükçekmece 1st Magistrate’s Court 29/05/2013 28/10 dated 13/01/2014 issued by the Ministry of Justice against the decision of Büyükçekmece 8th Criminal Court of First Instance dated 12/07/2013 and numbered 2013/186. The case file of the Supreme Court of Appeals Chief Prosecutor’s Office on 24/01/2014 and PUK. 2014/22872 with the notice given to the apartment read.
As mentioned in the notice; Law No. 5651 on the Regulation of Publications Made on the Internet and Combating Crimes Committed Through These Publications, Article 9 / 1-2. kişi the person claiming to have been violated due to the content may apply to the content provider and, if not available, to the content provider to request that the content related to him be removed from the publication and published on the internet for one week. The content or location provider will fulfill the request within two days of the date it was received.
During this time, if you have not met the demand shall be deemed rejected. If the request is deemed rejected, the person may apply to the settlement magistrate court within fifteen days and request that the content be removed from the publication and the publication of the reply, not exceeding the scope of the publication, to be published on the internet for a week. The magistrate will decide within three days without a hearing. The decision of the magistrate may be appealed in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Düzenleme Considering the regulation, @ertemsener user name and profile picture in the twitter account created with the user name and imitation tweet content in this account violates the honor and dignity of the person concerned. rights of the nature of the damage, created from the fake twitter account shares created, as if it belongs to A..Ş .. ’cause of the complaint, the user’s name subject to the complaint is sent to the profile referred to the opinion that the twitt was sent to the acceptance of the objection instead of the acceptance of the written the decision was rejected in such a way, and in accordance with Article 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure No. 5271, it was discussed and considered in the name of the Turkish Nation on the grounds of denunciation of the need for the benefit of the law; Since the content of the notification based on the request of the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation for the benefit of the law is observed on the spot, the decision of the 8th Criminal Court of Büyükçekmece 8th Criminal Court of First Instance dated 12.07.2013 and numbered 2013/186 D.Ş. It was unanimously resolved on 19/06/2014 that the user name and profile picture and tweet contents be removed from the publication.