{"id":3562,"date":"2020-10-14T14:54:52","date_gmt":"2020-10-14T11:54:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/?p=3562"},"modified":"2020-10-14T14:54:56","modified_gmt":"2020-10-14T11:54:56","slug":"decision-to-overturn-the-crime-of-theft-due-to-the-lack-of-conclusive-and-sufficient-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/blog\/alanya-lawyer-decision-to-overturn-the-crime-of-theft-due-to-the-lack-of-conclusive-and-sufficient-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"Decision To Overturn The Crime Of Theft Due To The Lack Of Conclusive And Sufficient Evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"<!--themify_builder_content-->\n<div id=\"themify_builder_content-3562\" data-postid=\"3562\" class=\"themify_builder_content themify_builder_content-3562 themify_builder tf_clear\">\n    <\/div>\n<!--\/themify_builder_content-->\n\n\n<p>T.C Supreme Court 2. Department Of The Penal Code No: 2014\/30129 Decision No: 2016\/9161, D. Date: 12.5.2016<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Court :Criminal Court of First Instance<br>Crime : theft, disturbing housing immunity<br>Sentencing: conviction<br>File reviewed and considered necessary;<br>I &#8211; the child who was dragged into the crime &#8230; and the defendants &#8230; and &#8230; in the review of the appeal request for the provisions of the conviction against him;<br>Defendants &#8230;.. and \u2026\u2026. about TCK 53. the decision of the Constitutional Court on the cancellation of some parts of the article entered into force on 24\/11\/2015 08\/10\/2015 day and 2014\/140 basis, 2015\/85 was also taken into consideration in the execution phase of the application of the deprivation of rights provided for in this article.<br>The hearing, the evidence collected, the reason, the judge&#8217;s opinion and discretion in accordance with the request for approval of the provisions with the rejection of the appeal is not in place,<br>II-in the examination of the appeal against the provisions of the conviction against the accused &#8230; and the child who was dragged into the crime &#8230; ;<br>1-in the face of understanding that the defendant &#8230;was convicted of another crime around the same jurisdiction on the date of sentencing; without asking whether the defendant wanted to be immune from the trial and without making a decision on this issue, the verdict was announced at the Hearing dated 08\/03\/2013 by deciding that he was convicted, 5271 CMK 196. restriction of the right to defense in violation of the article,<br>2 &#8211; a child dragged into a crime &#8230;in the face of the defense that he did not commit discarded crimes, a child dragged into a crime or other crime &#8230; and defendants &#8230;.., &#8230;&#8230; and &#8230;&#8230;\u2019he had participated in that crime the punishment is sure enough, and convincing evidence the absence of appropriate written obligations of acquittal without considering the law instead of deciding on,<br>It was unanimously decided on 12\/05\/2016 that the provisions should be overturned for the reasons described, as the child&#8217;s defense and the defendant&#8217;s appeals were considered in place in this regard.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C Supreme Court 2. Department Of The Penal Code No: 2014\/30129 Decision No: 2016\/9161, D. Date: 12.5.2016 Court :Criminal Court of First InstanceCrime : theft, disturbing housing immunitySentencing: convictionFile reviewed and considered necessary;I &#8211; the child who was dragged into the crime &#8230; and the defendants &#8230; and &#8230; in the review of the appeal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[16,2921,6106,22,17,2924],"yst_prominent_words":[777,1037,995,5628,1252,2274,85,99,1183,725,3154,1308,3085,3078,1245,936,1953,1377],"class_list":["post-3562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alanya-lawyer","tag-alanya","tag-antalya","tag-decision","tag-law","tag-lawyer","tag-theft","has-post-title","has-post-date","has-post-category","has-post-tag","has-post-comment","has-post-author",""],"builder_content":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3562"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3562\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3562"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=3562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}