{"id":2633,"date":"2020-04-13T16:21:41","date_gmt":"2020-04-13T13:21:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/?p=2633"},"modified":"2020-04-13T16:21:46","modified_gmt":"2020-04-13T13:21:46","slug":"competent-court-in-the-appeal-of-asset-discretion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/blog\/alanya-lawyer-competent-court-in-the-appeal-of-asset-discretion\/","title":{"rendered":"Competent Court In The Appeal Of Asset Discretion"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n <\/div>\n\n\n\n

T.C. Supreme Court 20. Legal Department<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Principal No: 2017\/9857 Decision No: 2017\/9650 Decision Date: 20.11.2017<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CASE FOR OBJECTION TO THE DISCRETION OF THE ASSET \u2013 THE GOODS BY INSTRUCTION
LOCATION RELATED TO THE FORECLOSURE MADE BY THE ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE
THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE IS CONNECTED TO THE FORECLOSURE IN THE COMPLAINTS
THE REQUIREMENT TO OBSERVE THAT THE EXECUTION COURT IS COMPETENT<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Summary: if the goods to be confiscated are elsewhere, the place of execution where the goods are located by instruction
the Executive Office which makes the foreclosure in the complaints about the foreclosure made by the Directorate is connected to the execution
it will be examined by the court. For this reason, asset appreciation is done through instruction.
as the jurisdiction of the execution court, where the Enforcement office is affiliated with the Enforcement office, which imposes the objections related to
must be determined.
(2004 p. K. m. 4, 79,128 \/ A)
In the case between the parties \u2026 Enforcement Law and \u2026 11. Jurisdiction separately by Enforcement Law Courts
final decision on file due to the decision of the District Court Courts to start operation
the courts that remain around the jurisdiction of two different district courts, if later granted
the decision to be mutually authoritarian and the Law No. 5235 36\/3. pursuant
The judicial jurisdiction within the jurisdiction of the regional courts courts of Law Offices is the first.
jurisdiction since degrees resolve disputes of authority and duty between law courts
all documents in the file sent to determine the location were examined, considered necessary:
The case relates to the objection to the discretion of the asset.
\u2026 By The Court Of Execution; \u2026 5. The Executive Office has written to the Executive Office on 12\/07\/2016 \u2026
in order to be the basis for the sale of the vehicle which is kept exclusively in the District \u2026
transaction facility in accordance with the instructions of the Enforcement Agency.
where, in this form of demand with the debtor’s Securities and real estate goods 3. rights in Persons and
in the direction of the seizure of the receivables and the general nature of a certain property is not the point that wants the seizure
the decision was made on the grounds that it was written in its format.
\u2026 11. The court of execution is concerned with the discretion of the asset in accordance with Article 128\/a-1 of the ICJ.
to make the complaint to the execution court where the execution office which makes the appreciation of the value is attached
as required, the appreciation of the asset \u2026 is made from the file of the Executive Office’s directive 2016\/89
it is understood that the competent court \u2026 is the executive Court to which the Executive Directorate is affiliated .
the decision was made on grounds of incompetence.
2004 No. 4\/1 of the ICJ. article ” \u2026 made against the treatment of the executive and Bankruptcy departments
examination of complaints and objections the judge of the executive Court or this duty in accordance with the law himself
given is done by the judge\u2026\u201d
79 Of The Same Law. in the article, ” The Enforcement Agency finally makes the foreclosure within three days of the request.
If the goods to be confiscated are elsewhere, the Enforcement office of the place where the goods are to be foreclosed
he writes right away. In this case, the complaints about foreclosure, the execution of the execution office subject to the subject
it shall be resolved by the court\u2026\u201d
As can be understood from the aforementioned legal regulations, execution follow-up is done by which execution Directorate.
appeals and complaints about the follow-up where the follow-up is carried out the execution to which the Executive Directorate is affiliated
it’ll be settled in court. However, if the goods to be confiscated are elsewhere, the goods are subject to instruction.
the place where the Enforcement Directorate of foreclosure complaints related to the foreclosure of the execution Department connected
it is examined by the execution court.
In the concrete case, the appreciation of the asset is done by the Executive Director, through the instruction, the appreciation of the asset.
authority to review objections to \u2026 11. It belongs to the court of execution.
Conclusion: for the reasons described above; HMK No. 6100 21 and 22. according to Articles 11. Execution
Unanimous decision on 20\/11\/2017 to determine the jurisdiction of the court
all I was given.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Supreme Court 20. Legal Department Principal No: 2017\/9857 Decision No: 2017\/9650 Decision Date: 20.11.2017 CASE FOR OBJECTION TO THE DISCRETION OF THE ASSET \u2013 THE GOODS BY INSTRUCTIONLOCATION RELATED TO THE FORECLOSURE MADE BY THE ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATETHE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE IS CONNECTED TO THE FORECLOSURE IN THE COMPLAINTSTHE REQUIREMENT TO OBSERVE THAT THE EXECUTION COURT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[3608,22,17],"yst_prominent_words":[3606,85,3607,725,3610,1540,3615,3613,1596,791,3184,3616,3612,3617,1595,3611,3618,1046,3614,3609],"class_list":["post-2633","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alanya-lawyer","tag-competent-court-in-the-appeal-of-asset-discretion","tag-law","tag-lawyer","has-post-title","has-post-date","has-post-category","has-post-tag","has-post-comment","has-post-author",""],"builder_content":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2633"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2633\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2633"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=2633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}