{"id":1508,"date":"2019-06-24T18:22:34","date_gmt":"2019-06-24T15:22:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/?p=1508"},"modified":"2019-08-19T21:57:10","modified_gmt":"2019-08-19T18:57:10","slug":"damage-caused-by-rock-fall-court-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/blog\/alanya-rechtsanwalt\/damage-caused-by-rock-fall-court-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Sch\u00e4den, die durch eine Entscheidung des Steinschlaggerichts verursacht wurden"},"content":{"rendered":"
15th Department of the Council of State<\/span>
Article No: 2016\/186<\/span>
Decision No: 2016\/1423<\/span><\/span><\/span>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Summary of the Referral: The Decision of the 4th Administrative Court of Antalya dated 12\/10\/2015 and E: 2015\/327;<\/span> K: Decision 2015\/64 is required to be reviewed and appealed for failure to comply with the law.<\/span><\/p>\n

15th Department of the Council of State<\/span>
Article No: 2016\/186<\/span>
Decision No: 2016\/1423<\/span><\/span>\n

Summary of the Referral: The Decision of the 4th Administrative Court of Antalya dated 12\/10\/2015 and E: 2015\/327;<\/span>\u00a0K: Decision 2015\/64 is required to be reviewed and appealed for failure to comply with the law.<\/span><\/p>\n

Summary of the defense: No defense was given.<\/span><\/p>\n

Opinion: In accordance with Law No. 2918, it is considered that the Administrative Court\u2019s decision on the rejection of the case should be reversed, since the settlement of the dispute is the duty of the Administrative Judiciary.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
Summary of the defense: No defense was given.<\/span>
<\/span>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
FOR THE TURKISH NATION<\/span>\n

The fifteenth Department of the Council of State, who made the decision, heard the explanations of the Investigative Judge and examined the documents in the file.<\/p>\n

Case; plaintiff\u2019s shipment and administration XX plate commercial transport vehicle on 24.02.2015 while cruising from Korkuteli to Fethiye on the road crashes due to crashing parts of the repair costs, transportation and value loss of 37.605,00-TL, due to loss of earnings 1.000,00 \u2013 TL and non-pecuniary damages of 20.000,00-TL; legal interest.<\/p>\n

4. By the Antalya Administrative Court; Pursuant to Article 110 of Law No. 2918, it was decided to dismiss the case in accordance with Article 15\/1-a of the Law on Administrative Procedure No. 2577 on the grounds that judicial judiciary was responsible for the settlement and settlement of the dispute.<\/p>\n

The defendant administration is requested to review and cancel the decision of the Administrative Court, which is alleged to be unlawful, on appeal.
In order to clarify the subject, the relevant legislation should be examined and examined in detail:<\/p>\n

According to the Law No. 6001 on the Organization and Duties, there is a public authority with a special legal entity, which has a public budget, and is authorized and authorized to construct, construct, ensure the safe use of highways, repair, operate and operate highways. That the public service in the form of fine road construction, maintenance and operation shall be carried out in accordance with the principles and rules of administrative law; There is no hesitation that the disputes arising from the administrative procedures and actions of the said General Directorate should be settled in the administrative jurisdiction in accordance with Article 125 of the Constitution and Article 2 of Law No. 2577. The amendment to the Highway Traffic Law no. 2918 made by Law no. 6099 does not include a new regulation on the legal responsibility of the road construction and maintenance service; does not change the judicial path.<\/p>\n

In Article 110 of Law No. 2918 and Article 14 of Law No. 6099, dated 19.1.2011 and amended by Article 14 of the Law \u201cIncluding those related to damages caused by vehicles which are the owner or owner of the State and other public institutions kurulu\u015f arising from liability cases, judicial judges. The fact that the injured person is a public official does not prevent the application of the provision of this paragraph. The provisions of this Law shall also apply to train-traffic accidents occurring at the level crossing. Lawsuits relating to legal liability for motor vehicle accidents can be filed in one of the courts of the place where the insurer\u2019s head office or branch office or the agency making the contract is located, or may be filed in the place where the accident occurred. \u201d<\/p>\n

In the aforementioned law provision, it is emphasized that the sorumluluk liability lawsuits arising from this law iyle means that the place of jurisdiction which is limited to the cases in which the rules regarding the legal responsibility in the Law No. 2918 will be applied is determined. Therefore, when determining the place of jurisdiction, it is necessary to determine whether the rules of liability, which are limited to the damages caused by motor vehicles, apply to the dispute in question.<\/p>\n

Law No. 2918, which aims to provide traffic safety in terms of safety of life and property on highways and to determine all measures related to traffic safety, besides General Directorate of Security, Ministry of National Education, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Ministry of Transportation, Maritime Affairs and Communication, authority through counting. However, the law does not regulate the legal responsibilities of other public administrations and, in the meantime, for the public services they undertake in relation to traffic order and traffic safety.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
In the eighth section of the Law No. 2918 titled legal liability and insurance; the legal responsibility of the undertaking to which the vehicle operator is affiliated; in other words, the legal responsibility of the vehicle owners and operators is regulated due to the damage caused by traffic accidents involving motor vehicles.<\/span>\n

When the provisions of the eighth part of the Law No. 2918 regarding legal responsibility are considered together; The judiciary\u2019s jurisdiction is the jurisdiction of the judicial judiciary to deal with all vehicle owners and operators, including those to be filed against public administrations and organizations in the capacity of vehicle operators due to accidents involving motor vehicles belonging to the state and other public institutions. However, in order to ensure the safety and order of the public administrations and organizations, both their establishment laws and the services they carry out in accordance with the Road Traffic Law No. 2918 are considered as public services and the responsibilities of the public administrations and institutions assigned in the Law No. 2918 are not regulated separately; with the request of compensation for the damages alleged to arise from traffic order and security services, the view and solution of the lawsuits against the related administrations are within the scope of the administrative judiciary.
As a result, the duties of the establishment of the law, which is repeated in Law No. 2918, ie; determination of the legal responsibility arising from public service in the form of road construction, maintenance, operation and traffic safety according to the principles and rules of administrative law; therefore, the full judicial proceedings to be filed must be resolved at the administrative jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

The examination of the case file; It is understood that the case which is being investigated under appeal with the request of payment of the damage caused by the incident, stating that the administration is defective due to the lack of adequate measures on the road which is under the care and responsibility of the defendant administration.<\/p>\n

In this case, the dispute is not the legal responsibility of the vehicle operator in private law, but under the Law no. and the failure of the services to be carried out completely, so that the services carried out are defective, the damage caused to the service is due to the allegation, the opinion and solution of the case belongs to the administrative courts.<\/p>\n

In this case, while the Administrative Court should examine the merits of the dispute and make a decision, the decision on the rejection of the case in respect of duty did not show any legal hit.<\/p>\n

For the reasons explained, the 4 th Administrative Court of Antalya dated 12\/10\/2015 and numbered E: 2015\/327; K: 2015\/64 decision to be overturned, a new decision to be sent to the court to be sent to the said cou<\/p>\n

. Abteilung des Staatsrates<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00a0
<\/span>Artikel-Nr .: 2016\/186<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00a0
<\/span>Beschluss Nr .: 2016\/1423<\/span><\/span><\/span>\n

Zusammenfassung der Vorlage: Die Entscheidung des 4. Verwaltungsgerichts von Antalya vom 12.10.2015 und E: 2015\/327;<\/span><\/span>\u00a0K: Die Entscheidung 2015\/64 muss \u00fcberpr\u00fcft und wegen Versto\u00dfes gegen das Gesetz angefochten werden.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Zusammenfassung der Klagebeantwortung: Es wurde keine Klagebeantwortung abgegeben.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Gutachten: Nach dem Gesetz Nr. 2918 ist die Entscheidung des Verwaltungsgerichts \u00fcber die Ablehnung des Falls aufzuheben, da die Beilegung des Streits Aufgabe der Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit ist.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
Zusammenfassung der Klagebeantwortung: Es wurde keine Klagebeantwortung abgegeben.<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00a0
<\/span>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
F\u00dcR DIE T\u00dcRKISCHE NATION<\/span><\/span>\n

Die f\u00fcnfzehnte Abteilung des Staatsrates, die die Entscheidung traf, h\u00f6rte die Erkl\u00e4rungen des Untersuchungsrichters an und \u00fcberpr\u00fcfte die Akten.<\/span><\/p>\n

Fall;<\/span>\u00a0Sendung und Verwaltung des Kl\u00e4gers Nutzfahrzeug mit XX Kennzeichen am 24.02.2015 w\u00e4hrend der Fahrt von Korkuteli nach Fethiye auf der Stra\u00dfe st\u00fcrzt ab, weil Teile der Reparaturkosten abst\u00fcrzen, Transportkosten und Wertverlust von 37.605,00-TL, wegen Verdienstausfall 1.000, 00 – TL und immaterielle Sch\u00e4den in H\u00f6he von 20.000,00 TL;<\/span>\u00a0rechtliches Interesse.<\/span><\/p>\n

4. Durch das Verwaltungsgericht von Antalya;<\/span>\u00a0Gem\u00e4\u00df Artikel 110 des Gesetzes Nr. 2918 wurde beschlossen, den Fall gem\u00e4\u00df Artikel 15\/1-a des Gesetzes \u00fcber das Verwaltungsverfahren Nr. 2577 mit der Begr\u00fcndung zur\u00fcckzuweisen, dass die Justiz f\u00fcr die Beilegung und Beilegung des Vertrags verantwortlich war bestreiten.<\/span><\/p>\n

Die beklagte Verwaltung wird aufgefordert, die angeblich rechtswidrige Entscheidung des Verwaltungsgerichts in der Berufung zu \u00fcberpr\u00fcfen und aufzuheben.<\/span>\u00a0
Zur Kl\u00e4rung des Themas sollten die einschl\u00e4gigen Rechtsvorschriften gepr\u00fcft und eingehend gepr\u00fcft werden:<\/span><\/p>\n

Nach dem Gesetz Nr. 6001 \u00fcber Organisation und Pflichten gibt es eine Beh\u00f6rde mit einer besonderen juristischen Person, die \u00fcber ein \u00f6ffentliches Budget verf\u00fcgt und zum Bau, zur Konstruktion, zur Gew\u00e4hrleistung der sicheren Nutzung von Autobahnen, zur Reparatur und zum Betrieb befugt und befugt ist und Autobahnen betreiben.<\/span>\u00a0Der \u00f6ffentliche Dienst in Form von Stra\u00dfenbau, Instandhaltung und Betrieb ist nach den Grunds\u00e4tzen und Regeln des Verwaltungsrechts zu erbringen.<\/span>\u00a0Es besteht kein Zweifel, dass die Streitigkeiten, die sich aus den Verwaltungsverfahren und -handlungen der genannten Generaldirektion ergeben, gem\u00e4\u00df Artikel 125 der Verfassung und Artikel 2 des Gesetzes Nr. 2577 in der Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit beigelegt werden sollten. Die \u00c4nderung des Stra\u00dfenverkehrsgesetzes Nein.<\/span>\u00a02918 hergestellt durch Gesetz Nr.<\/span>\u00a06099 enth\u00e4lt keine neue Vorschrift \u00fcber die rechtliche Verantwortung des Stra\u00dfenbau- und Instandhaltungsdienstes;<\/span>\u00a0\u00e4ndert nicht den gerichtlichen Weg.<\/span><\/p>\n

In Artikel 110 des Gesetzes Nr. 2918 und Artikel 14 des Gesetzes Nr. 6099 vom 19.1.2011 und ge\u00e4ndert durch Artikel 14 des Gesetzes \u201eEinschlie\u00dflich derjenigen, die sich auf Sch\u00e4den beziehen, die durch Fahrzeuge verursacht werden, die Eigent\u00fcmer oder Eigent\u00fcmer des Staates oder anderer Verkehrskreise sind Institutionen aus Haftungsf\u00e4llen, Richter.<\/span>\u00a0Die Tatsache, dass die verletzte Person ein Beamter ist, steht der Anwendung der Bestimmung dieses Absatzes nicht entgegen.<\/span>\u00a0Die Bestimmungen dieses Gesetzes gelten auch f\u00fcr Verkehrsunf\u00e4lle am Bahn\u00fcbergang.<\/span>\u00a0Klagen in Bezug auf die gesetzliche Haftung bei Kraftfahrzeugunf\u00e4llen k\u00f6nnen an einem der Gerichte des Ortes eingereicht werden, an dem sich die Haupt- oder Zweigniederlassung des Versicherers oder die vertragsschlie\u00dfende Stelle befindet, oder an dem Ort, an dem der Unfall aufgetreten ist.<\/span>\u00a0„<\/span><\/p>\n

In der oben genannten Gesetzesvorschrift wird betont, dass aufgrund der sich aus diesem Gesetz ergebenden Sorumluluk-Haftungsklagen der Gerichtsstand bestimmt wird, der sich auf die F\u00e4lle beschr\u00e4nkt, in denen die Bestimmungen \u00fcber die rechtliche Verantwortung im Gesetz Nr. 2918 angewendet werden .<\/span>\u00a0Daher ist bei der Bestimmung des Gerichtsstands zu pr\u00fcfen, ob die Haftungsregeln, die sich auf die durch Kraftfahrzeuge verursachten Sch\u00e4den beschr\u00e4nken, auf den betreffenden Rechtsstreit anwendbar sind.<\/span><\/p>\n

Gesetz Nr. 2918, das die Verkehrssicherheit in Bezug auf die Sicherheit von Leben und Eigentum auf Autobahnen und die Festlegung aller Ma\u00dfnahmen in Bezug auf die Verkehrssicherheit neben der Generaldirektion Sicherheit, dem Ministerium f\u00fcr nationale Bildung, dem Ministerium f\u00fcr Ern\u00e4hrung, Landwirtschaft und Viehzucht zum Ziel hat, Ministerium f\u00fcr Verkehr, Seefahrt und Kommunikation, Autorit\u00e4t durch Z\u00e4hlung.<\/span>\u00a0Das Gesetz regelt jedoch nicht die rechtlichen Verantwortlichkeiten anderer \u00f6ffentlicher Verwaltungen und in der Zwischenzeit die \u00f6ffentlichen Dienstleistungen, die sie in Bezug auf die Verkehrsordnung und die Verkehrssicherheit erbringen.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
Im achten Abschnitt des Gesetzes Nr. 2918 mit dem Titel gesetzliche Haftung und Versicherung;<\/span><\/span>\u00a0die rechtliche Verantwortung des Unternehmens, dem der Fahrzeughalter angeschlossen ist;<\/span><\/span>\u00a0Mit anderen Worten, die rechtliche Verantwortung der Fahrzeughalter und -betreiber ist aufgrund der durch Verkehrsunf\u00e4lle mit Kraftfahrzeugen verursachten Sch\u00e4den geregelt.<\/span><\/span>\n

Wenn die Bestimmungen des achten Teils des Gesetzes Nr. 2918 \u00fcber die rechtliche Verantwortung zusammen betrachtet werden;<\/span>\u00a0Die Zust\u00e4ndigkeit der Justiz ist die Zust\u00e4ndigkeit der Justiz f\u00fcr alle Fahrzeugeigner und -betreiber, einschlie\u00dflich derer, die als Fahrzeugbetreiber bei Unf\u00e4llen mit Kraftfahrzeugen des Staates oder anderer \u00f6ffentlicher Einrichtungen gegen \u00f6ffentliche Verwaltungen und Organisationen eingereicht werden.<\/span>\u00a0Um jedoch die Sicherheit und Ordnung der \u00f6ffentlichen Verwaltungen und Organisationen zu gew\u00e4hrleisten, werden sowohl ihre Niederlassungsgesetze als auch die von ihnen gem\u00e4\u00df dem Stra\u00dfenverkehrsgesetz Nr. 2918 erbrachten Dienstleistungen als \u00f6ffentliche Dienstleistungen und als Verantwortlichkeiten der \u00f6ffentlichen Verwaltungen und angesehen Institutionen, die im Gesetz Nr. 2918 zugewiesen sind, werden nicht separat reguliert;<\/span>\u00a0Mit der Bitte um Entsch\u00e4digung f\u00fcr den Schaden, der angeblich durch die Verkehrsbeh\u00f6rden und Sicherheitsdienste entstanden ist, f\u00e4llt die Ansicht und L\u00f6sung der Klagen gegen die zust\u00e4ndigen Beh\u00f6rden in den Zust\u00e4ndigkeitsbereich der Verwaltungsgerichte.<\/span>\u00a0
Infolgedessen sind die Pflichten der Errichtung des Gesetzes, die im Gesetz Nr. 2918 wiederholt wird, dh;<\/span>Feststellung der rechtlichen Verantwortung aus dem \u00f6ffentlichen Dienst in Form von Stra\u00dfenbau, Instandhaltung, Betrieb und Verkehrssicherheit nach den Grunds\u00e4tzen und Regeln des Verwaltungsrechts;<\/span>\u00a0Daher muss das gesamte einzureichende Gerichtsverfahren in der Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit entschieden werden.<\/span><\/p>\n

Die Pr\u00fcfung der Akte;<\/span>\u00a0Es wird davon ausgegangen, dass der Fall, der mit der Aufforderung zur Zahlung des Schadens, der durch den Vorfall verursacht wurde, untersucht wird, und dass die Verwaltung fehlerhaft ist, weil keine angemessenen Ma\u00dfnahmen auf der Stra\u00dfe getroffen wurden, die unter der Obhut und Verantwortung der Beh\u00f6rde liegt Beklagte Verwaltung.<\/span><\/p>\n

In diesem Fall liegt der Streitfall nicht in der rechtlichen Verantwortung des Fahrzeugbetreibers im Privatrecht, sondern nach dem Gesetz Nr.<\/span>\u00a0und das Vers\u00e4umnis der Dienstleistungen vollst\u00e4ndig durchgef\u00fchrt werden, so dass die erbrachten Dienstleistungen mangelhaft sind, der Schaden an der Dienstleistung auf den Vorwurf zur\u00fcckzuf\u00fchren ist, geh\u00f6rt die Meinung und L\u00f6sung des Falles den Verwaltungsgerichten.<\/span><\/p>\n

In diesem Fall hatte das Verwaltungsgericht zwar die Begr\u00fcndetheit des Rechtsstreits zu pr\u00fcfen und eine Entscheidung zu treffen, die Entscheidung \u00fcber die Ablehnung des Rechtsstreits in Bezug auf den Zoll jedoch keinen rechtlichen Erfolg.<\/span><\/p>\n

Aus den erl\u00e4uterten Gr\u00fcnden hat das 4. Verwaltungsgericht von Antalya vom 12.10.2015 die Nummer E: 2015\/327;<\/span>K: Entscheidung 2015\/64, die aufgehoben werden soll, eine neue Entscheidung, die an das Gericht zu richten ist, die an das Gericht zu richten ist, Artikel 54 des Gesetzes Nr. 2577 1 der Entscheidung, die auf den Zeitpunkt der Bekanntgabe dieser Entscheidung folgt, innerhalb von f\u00fcnfzehn Tagen , einschlie\u00dflich des Weges zur Korrektur der Entscheidung, wurde 07\/03 \/ 2016 einstimmig beschlossen.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Opinion: In accordance with Law No. 2918, it is considered that the Administrative Court’s decision on the rejection of the case should be reversed, since the settlement of the dispute is the duty of the Administrative Judiciary.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
Summary of the defense: No defense was given.<\/span>
<\/span>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n
FOR THE TURKISH NATION<\/span><\/span>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

The fifteenth Department of the Council of State, who made the decision, heard the explanations of the Investigative Judge and examined the documents in the file.<\/p>\n

Case; plaintiff’s shipment and administration XX plate commercial transport vehicle on 24.02.2015 while cruising from Korkuteli to Fethiye on the road crashes due to crashing parts of the repair costs, transportation and value loss of 37.605,00-TL, due to loss of earnings 1.000,00 – TL and non-pecuniary damages of 20.000,00-TL; legal interest.<\/p>\n

4. By the Antalya Administrative Court; Pursuant to Article 110 of Law No. 2918, it was decided to dismiss the case in accordance with Article 15\/1-a of the Law on Administrative Procedure No. 2577 on the grounds that judicial judiciary was responsible for the settlement and settlement of the dispute.<\/p>\n

The defendant administration is requested to review and cancel the decision of the Administrative Court, which is alleged to be unlawful, on appeal.
In order to clarify the subject, the relevant legislation should be examined and examined in detail:<\/p>\n

According to the Law No. 6001 on the Organization and Duties, there is a public authority with a special legal entity, which has a public budget, and is authorized and authorized to construct, construct, ensure the safe use of highways, repair, operate and operate highways. That the public service in the form of fine road construction, maintenance and operation shall be carried out in accordance with the principles and rules of administrative law; There is no hesitation that the disputes arising from the administrative procedures and actions of the said General Directorate should be settled in the administrative jurisdiction in accordance with Article 125 of the Constitution and Article 2 of Law No. 2577. The amendment to the Highway Traffic Law no. 2918 made by Law no. 6099 does not include a new regulation on the legal responsibility of the road construction and maintenance service; does not change the judicial path.<\/p>\n

In Article 110 of Law No. 2918 and Article 14 of Law No. 6099, dated 19.1.2011 and amended by Article 14 of the Law \u201cIncluding those related to damages caused by vehicles which are the owner or owner of the State and other public institutions kurulu\u015f arising from liability cases, judicial judges. The fact that the injured person is a public official does not prevent the application of the provision of this paragraph. The provisions of this Law shall also apply to train-traffic accidents occurring at the level crossing. Lawsuits relating to legal liability for motor vehicle accidents can be filed in one of the courts of the place where the insurer’s head office or branch office or the agency making the contract is located, or may be filed in the place where the accident occurred. \u201d<\/p>\n

In the aforementioned law provision, it is emphasized that the sorumluluk liability lawsuits arising from this law iyle means that the place of jurisdiction which is limited to the cases in which the rules regarding the legal responsibility in the Law No. 2918 will be applied is determined. Therefore, when determining the place of jurisdiction, it is necessary to determine whether the rules of liability, which are limited to the damages caused by motor vehicles, apply to the dispute in question.<\/p>\n

Law No. 2918, which aims to provide traffic safety in terms of safety of life and property on highways and to determine all measures related to traffic safety, besides General Directorate of Security, Ministry of National Education, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Ministry of Transportation, Maritime Affairs and Communication, authority through counting. However, the law does not regulate the legal responsibilities of other public administrations and, in the meantime, for the public services they undertake in relation to traffic order and traffic safety.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
In the eighth section of the Law No. 2918 titled legal liability and insurance; the legal responsibility of the undertaking to which the vehicle operator is affiliated; in other words, the legal responsibility of the vehicle owners and operators is regulated due to the damage caused by traffic accidents involving motor vehicles.<\/span><\/span>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

When the provisions of the eighth part of the Law No. 2918 regarding legal responsibility are considered together; The judiciary’s jurisdiction is the jurisdiction of the judicial judiciary to deal with all vehicle owners and operators, including those to be filed against public administrations and organizations in the capacity of vehicle operators due to accidents involving motor vehicles belonging to the state and other public institutions. However, in order to ensure the safety and order of the public administrations and organizations, both their establishment laws and the services they carry out in accordance with the Road Traffic Law No. 2918 are considered as public services and the responsibilities of the public administrations and institutions assigned in the Law No. 2918 are not regulated separately; with the request of compensation for the damages alleged to arise from traffic order and security services, the view and solution of the lawsuits against the related administrations are within the scope of the administrative judiciary.
As a result, the duties of the establishment of the law, which is repeated in Law No. 2918, ie; determination of the legal responsibility arising from public service in the form of road construction, maintenance, operation and traffic safety according to the principles and rules of administrative law; therefore, the full judicial proceedings to be filed must be resolved at the administrative jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

The examination of the case file; It is understood that the case which is being investigated under appeal with the request of payment of the damage caused by the incident, stating that the administration is defective due to the lack of adequate measures on the road which is under the care and responsibility of the defendant administration.<\/p>\n

In this case, the dispute is not the legal responsibility of the vehicle operator in private law, but under the Law no. and the failure of the services to be carried out completely, so that the services carried out are defective, the damage caused to the service is due to the allegation, the opinion and solution of the case belongs to the administrative courts.<\/p>\n

In this case, while the Administrative Court should examine the merits of the dispute and make a decision, the decision on the rejection of the case in respect of duty did not show any legal hit.<\/p>\n

For the reasons explained, the 4 th Administrative Court of Antalya dated 12\/10\/2015 and numbered E: 2015\/327; K: 2015\/64 decision to be overturned, a new decision to be sent to the court to be sent to the said court, Article 54 of the Law No. 2577 1 of the decision following the date of notification of this decision within fifteen days, including the way to correct the decision, 07\/03 \/ 2016 was unanimously decided.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

\n <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

15th Department of the Council of StateArticle No: 2016\/186Decision No: 2016\/1423 \u00a0 Summary of the Referral: The Decision of the 4th Administrative Court of Antalya dated 12\/10\/2015 and E: 2015\/327; K: Decision 2015\/64 is required to be reviewed and appealed for failure to comply with the law. 15th Department of the Council of StateArticle No: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"yst_prominent_words":[2882,822,2343,2337,2345,2344,2338,639,2893,2891,645,2892,70,2339,2342,2894,2340,2346,2895,544],"class_list":["post-1508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alanya-rechtsanwalt","has-post-title","has-post-date","has-post-category","has-post-tag","has-post-comment","has-post-author",""],"builder_content":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1508"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1508"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1508\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2085,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1508\/revisions\/2085"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1508"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alanya.law\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=1508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}