… TO THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT;
CONTESTING :
ADDRESS :
Deputy :
ADDRESS :
Subject: … our objection to the decision of the Attorney General’s Office … / … / … to merge the date and … / … numbered … / … communicated on the date.
INSTRUCTIONS
1 -) … Attorney General Of The Republic … / … Hazrat Mahdi (As) and … / Hz. as a result of his examination of numbered files, he decided to merge the files on the grounds that there was a legal and actual contact between the preparatory documents, … / … Hz.Dec. closing the registration of numbered documents, transactions … / … Hazrat Mahdi (as). he has decided to carry out the numbered document and …/…/… the date and …/… the decision to merge the numbered …/…/… is not in place, although it has been communicated on the date.
2-) Because of a merge between files in the file for at least one of the ones suspect the decision in terms of the partnership, i.e., at least one person in every one of the files that are planned to be merged in “dubious”, though to be listed as; to combine, which is subject from the file …/… Hz. although our client is a suspect in the number file, he did not have an adjective in terms of the other file, and only his testimony in relation to the relevant file was applied, and this issue was overlooked. The situation will also be noticed with the examination of the files by your court.
3 -) for the reasons we have explained … the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic decided to remove the decision to merge …/…/… day and…/…, and it was necessary to request that the file be sent back to the relevant Attorney General’s office to fulfill this issue.
Legal reasons: 5271 P. K. m. 8-11 and related legislation.
CONCLUSION AND PROMPT
For the reasons explained above, we respectfully request and request that the file be sent back to the relevant Attorney General’s office in order to fulfill this matter by deciding to remove the decision of the Attorney General’s office to merge the day and … / … no. …/…/…
Acting Objector